First case of locally-transmitted Zika virus infection reported in Singapore: MOH, NEA


SINGAPORE: A 47-year-old Malaysian woman living at Block 102 Aljunied Crescent is Singapore’s first reported case of locally-transmitted Zika virus infection, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and National Environment Agency (NEA) said on Saturday (Aug 27).

As she had not travelled to Zika-affected areas recently, she was likely to have been infected in Singapore, MOH and NEA said in a joint news release.

According to MOH and NEA, the patient had developed symptoms such as fever, rash and conjunctivitis from Thursday. She visited a general practitioner (GP) on Friday and was referred to Tan Tock Seng Hospital’s Communicable Diseases Centre (CDC), where she tested positive for the Zika virus on Saturday.

“She has since been hospitalised for observation at the CDC. The patient is currently well and recovering,” the news release said.

Map of Block 102, Aljunied Crescent. (Map: Google Maps)

MOH is screening the patient’s close contacts, including household members, the release stated, adding that it is also carrying out Zika testing on others living and working in the area, who have symptoms of fever and rash.

“At this point, three other suspect cases – two in a family who live in the area and an individual who works in the area – had preliminarily tested positive based on their urine samples. They are pending further confirmation tests,” the release stated.

The release said MOH has alerted all GPs around the patient’s home and workplace to be extra vigilant and to immediately report patients with symptoms associated with Zika virus infection to MOH. As an added precaution, all suspect Zika cases will be isolated while awaiting confirmation of the blood test results, the release added.

Block 102 Aljunied Crescent, where the patient lives.

“MOH and NEA will also actively alert residents in the vicinity to seek medical attention should they develop symptoms,” the release said.

This comes after Singapore reported its first imported Zika case on May 13. The patient, a 48-year-old man, had travelled to Brazil from Mar 27 to May 7.

“With the presence of Zika in our region and the volume of travel by Singaporeans as well as tourists, it is inevitable that there will be imported cases of Zika into Singapore. There is also risk of subsequent local transmission, as the Aedes mosquito vector is present here. While MOH and NEA have stepped up precautionary measures, we expect that there may be further cases, as most infected persons may display mild or no symptoms,” the release added.

Minister for Health Gan Kim Yong said: “MOH and NEA are working together to carry out vector control and testing of residents in that area with fever and rashes so as to reduce the risk of further spread. I encourage those who are unwell and with these symptoms to visit their doctors for medical attention. We have also alerted our clinics in the area to look out for suspect cases and refer them to the CDC for testing.”

INTENSIFIED VECTOR CONTROL OPERATIONS IN VICINITY OF ALJUNIED CRESCENT

The release also said NEA has intensified vector control operations to control the Aedes mosquito population in the vicinity of Aljunied Crescent by deploying about 100 officers to inspect the area.

These include:

  • Inspecting all premises, ground and congregation areas
  • Conducting mandatory treatment such as ultra-low volume (ULV) misting of premises and thermal fogging of outdoor areas to kill adult mosquitoes
  • Increasing frequency of drain flushing and oiling to prevent breeding
  • Public education outreach and distribution of insect repellents

When Channel NewsAsia visited Aljunied Crescent on Saturday evening, NEA flyers were seen on lift landings, informing residents of the symptoms and dangers of the Zika virus. There were also flyers stating that fogging would be carried out on Sunday, due to dengue cases in the area.

“NEA is also conducting outreach efforts and distributing Zika information leaflets and insect repellents to residents living in the area,” the release said.

Additionally, the Inter-Agency Dengue Task Force will be activated to help reduce the risk of the virus spreading further.

The release also noted that the patient’s residence at Aljunied Crescent is not located in an active dengue cluster, but there are two active dengue clusters nearby, each with two cases. It added that as the majority of people infected with the virus do not show symptoms, it is possible that some transmission may already have taken place before this case of Zika was notified.

“Hence, even as NEA conducts operations to contain the transmission of the Zika virus, residents are urged to cooperate fully with NEA and allow its officers to inspect their premises for mosquito breeding and to spray insecticide to kill any mosquitoes. NEA may need to gain entry into inaccessible premises by force after serving of requisite Notices, to ensure any breeding habitats are destroyed quickly,” the release said.

Authorities also urged members of the public to take immediate steps to prevent mosquito breeding in homes by doing the 5-step Mozzie Wipeout every alternate day, and protect themselves from mosquito bites by applying insect repellent regularly.

“Zika is generally a mild disease. It may cause a viral fever similar to dengue or chikungunya, with fever, skin rashes, body aches, and headache. But many people infected with the Zika virus infection do not even develop symptoms,” the release stated.

“Zika virus infection can however cause microcephaly in the unborn foetuses of pregnant women. We advise residents, especially pregnant women, in the Aljunied Crescent area to monitor their health. They should seek medical attention if they are unwell, especially with symptoms such as fever and rash. They should also inform their doctors of the location of their residence and workplace. Those without these symptoms but who are concerned that they have been infected with the Zika virus should consult and follow the advice of their doctors regarding the monitoring of their pregnancy,” the release added.

Members of the public should refer to MOH’s webpage on Zika for the latest health advisory, authorities added. 



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA

Rights for women were hard-fought and must be preserved, improved: Dr Aline Wong


SINGAPORE: Dr Aline Wong made headlines in the 1980s as one of the first women MPs to enter Parliament after a 14-year hiatus.

A sociologist by training, Dr Wong came to Singapore as an academic with a focus on issues affecting women. As a politician, she was intent on walking the talk by continuing to champion women’s rights, and led the People’s Action Party (PAP) women’s wing until her retirement in 2001. She also made her mark in leading policy on other issues, as Minister of State for Health, and in the mid-1990s, as Senior Minister of State with the additional portfolio of Education.

Recently, she made headlines for blazing the trail for women again, being appointed as Chancellor of UniSIM – the first female Chancellor in Singapore’s educational history.

She went On the Record with Bharati Jagdish about her past political life, women’s rights and politics today. But first, they spoke about what brought her to Singapore from Hong Kong all those years ago.

Aline Wong: In the 1960s, my husband and I were already lecturing at two separate universities in Hong Kong but we didn’t particularly like the British colonial system there. And we had strong feelings about issues of our citizenship and giving our children a country to call home. So when we came to Singapore in late 1969, on our way to a conference in Australia, some friends we knew from a long time ago, talked to us and said: “Why don’t you just come and make a career here, make a life here?”

Singapore was young and independent and needed people. So that was the time that the university here was looking far afield for foreigners who had the qualifications to be academics. So we both happened to already have our PhDs and have a career in academia, so we went for interviews and we landed two jobs at the same time. So it was a very natural thing for us to come but it meant uprooting. We did it, and we have never really turned back since then.

Bharati: Why did you enter politics?

Wong: I think the simple answer to that was that it was really answering a call to duty. I say duty because by then I had lived in the country and had been a citizen for so long. I had always been teaching social issues, political issues, and so on. I received that call to tea, interviews. And so I said: “If you are asked to serve, what’s the reason for saying no?” I had no reason whatsoever. Also, I had to walk my talk. I was advocating very much for women’s participation in all aspects of the nation’s life – economic, political, social and so on.

So when I was asked to serve, I really could not say no to Mr Goh Chok Tong then. I think they probably had noticed me in my work, in my publications, and I was quite active in serving on various Government committees. I was very outspoken then, so I think they must have spotted me. 

Bharati: What influenced you? You’ve mentioned your father before.

Wong: My father just wanted me to think of a larger purpose in life, and to do something for others and for society. He never asked me to be outspoken, but it’s my personality. And as a lecturer, I taught theories and knowledge. So I spoke my mind, and was critical. I saw inequalities and I spoke my mind. 

BEING A WOMAN IN POLITICS

Bharati: You were one of three women who entered Parliament after a 14-year hiatus. While it was a great opportunity, I’m sure there were challenges as well.

Wong: We were hailed as a pioneering batch of women MPs, which is not quite true because before us, there were already women legislators, but this hiatus of 14 years did make it a very special opportunity, a special kind of a challenge. But the three of us took it in our stride. I think we were professionals in each of our own fields, and it’s not that we were afraid of speaking in public or afraid of connecting with the people on the ground, so the challenge wasn’t really being the first women to enter Parliament but actually how we would carry out our role, so as not to disappoint.

Bharati: Was it a lot of pressure?

Wong: I think much of the pressure was actually brought upon us by ourselves. At least it was so in my case. I needed to show and prove to myself and to my friends that women parliamentarians make a difference, should make a difference. We had our different viewpoints. We had our issues of concern and we brought our experience, our viewpoints to bear on policy issues, and therefore having women represented in Parliament should make a difference. I consciously had to prove myself as a speaker, as an elected member in the constituency. I had to prove I could lead, that I could gel the team together, the community. I had to prove I could do all these things as a man could.

Bharati: Was it at all challenging to get the men in Parliament to take you seriously? Or was there no issue at all?

Wong: Our views were well-considered among the professionals. We did not make flippant remarks. We were well-prepared. In fact, I noticed that the women MPs tend to do a lot of homework when they speak in Parliament, they ask follow-up questions, they institute projects and so on, so why should the men not take us seriously?

I think even in the 1980s in Singapore, when the three of us entered Parliament, we did not encounter a patronising attitude towards us. So there was no overt negative feeling targeted at us. If anything, I think they began to realise they had to watch their language a little bit more, be respectful and so on and so forth. Altogether it was positive.

Bharati: Even among the constituents?

Wong: Constituents, the grassroots leaders – definitely. You should look at some of the old pictures I kept when I first entered Parliament. When we took pictures with grassroots leaders, I was the only woman there in the centre. I don’t think it was bad at all because I think first of all, if you had a good education, they respected you. If you worked and you were serious, they also had to be serious with you.

Bharati: I’m sure politics was quite different then. These days, I’m sure you would have noticed that people are more outspoken, more demanding of their MPs.

Wong: They also have their own views which are well-considered. They are well-educated. They can talk about policies and give you views on the same level as you. Politics in contemporary society is a bit more complex, and not just because people are better-educated, but because there’s more diversity. And now there’s social media to contend with, so politics is more complex and more challenging now.

Bharati: Would the young Aline Wong enter politics the way it is today?

Wong: If I were a young person of this contemporary age, I would still do it. But thinking back, I was just suitable for that period when there were burning issues to be settled in the area of women’s representation for example, and they were settled on very reasonable grounds. 

GETTING MORE WOMEN IN POLITICS

Bharati: Why was there this long hiatus? You’ve mentioned some theories before.

Wong: Well, I had written and speculated about it in my previous publications. I think ever since the Women’s Charter was passed in 1961, there was a mini-victory of sorts that there was equal pay between men and women in the civil service in 1960s. Then the start of the women’s movement in the early 1960s – in those days the focus was on women’s right to vote, women’s right to education, and legal reforms in the marriage institution and they got it.

So after that, the women’s movement actually cooled down a lot. Then as people were getting better-educated, there was the emerging middle-class. As such, the interest of women also turned to issues of lifestyle. There was actually a network of women’s committees at the community centres already, in the 1960s. But the women there were focused on social, recreational, cultural activities. So the tenor of the women’s concern became very much focused on daily life, social participation and so on.

Bharati: What about workforce participation?

Wong: Oh, I mean in the intervening years, since the 1960s and 1970s especially, you see a steady increase in the female labour force participation rate. There was not much of a problem. Except that if you noticed at the beginning, they were semi-skilled workers in the semiconductor industry, in the service industry. Then they rose through the ranks to be executives and professionals.

Bharati: But not so much politicians clearly.

Wong: Not so much politicians. But then I remember very clearly that in 1984, Mr Goh Chok Tong was asked why there no women candidate at the previous election. His answer then… I think he has changed his stance tremendously since then. So, good of him.

Bharati: What did he say then?

Wong: He said that the women should or have to ask the husband’s permission. I remember that.

Bharati: Did you ever have to ask your husband for permission? 

Wong: I discussed with him of course, because he is my husband.

Bharati: But you didn’t ask him for permission.

Wong: No, no the decision was mutual and was really even with some consultation with our growing-up kids. So 1984, he (Mr Goh) was looking out for women candidates earnestly. In ’88 he put in more time and effort but still, he netted only one more woman MP which was Dr Seet Ai Mee.

Bharati: Why do you think Mr Goh changed his mind about this?

Wong: I don’t want to hold it against him that much, now that things have changed a lot. He came from a generation of Singapore men who were brought up in the traditional way of looking at men being necessarily the head of household. But since then, women have advanced so much in status. It is not right now to even say such things, and certainly such things are no longer said.

Bharati: You say things have changed. Indeed they have, but if we’re talking about women’s participation in politics, it is still quite concerning relative to what’s happening in other parts of the world or even based on what’s in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

We currently have 22 women in Parliament out of a total of 92 seats. This is 24 per cent of the House. Better than what it was before, sure, but still lacking according to a lot of activists. More recently, of course we have Ms Grace Fu who is Culture, Community and Youth Minister, the first female full minister to helm a ministry. For a country that has advanced economically, where women are highly-educated, why are we still lacking in this arena? And as you said earlier, Mr Goh tried harder in 1988 to get more women candidates, but ended up netting only one.

Wong: It’s still tremendous progress. Even if you look back 10 years ago, I think the number was in the teens. Now we have more than 20. So it’s tremendous progress. If you look around at the percentage representation of female parliamentarians in Singapore, our percentage is very respectable. It is better than the average of many Asia-Pacific countries. Now if you are talking about previously communist countries, yes, they had more women representation but since they opened up, the percentage declined.

If you talk about the Scandinavian countries, yes they are still leading the world, but also they have a conscious policy, some with quotas for their parties to nominate a certain percentage of female candidates at each election.

But I think no country in this world has yet stated its target is 50 per cent. My point is we have made such tremendous progress, so what’s still holding women back? 

Not every woman really wants to go into politics. It’s the same for men, not every man wants to go into politics. 

REFINING GENDER ROLES

Bharati: Yet there are more men than women, so how would you account for that?

Wong: This is a long-term kind of an analysis that women are still responsible for the family, for the household management, for taking care of children and of the elderly relatives. So these are the multiple roles that women still play in our society that do not give them that much time and opportunity to devote to public life. They’re already struggling with their professions and careers.

Bharati: It’s about gender roles and certain mindsets within the household as well. Men need to step up a little bit more and get more involved in running the household, so that you both can have fruitful careers outside if that is what you desire.

Wong: But also, some women are now opting for sequencing their priorities in life. They’ve got the education. They’ve started brilliant, very good professions, but after they get married, they want children and when they have children, some of them want to devote more time, if not all their time to the children. So they are now sequencing what’s important in their life. Previously, people were trying to be supermoms, superwomen. Then I think by and by, we realised that it is very difficult, because you have to sacrifice something, you cannot have it all at one go. 

Bharati: But men never have to worry about that. It is entrenched ideas of gender roles that has led to this, isn’t it? Women might only be making those choices because their husbands won’t. How can such mindsets be changed?

Wong: It is true. It takes time, but I think in some countries like the Scandinavian countries, men and women’s roles are blurring. It is very common to find men tending to young children and perhaps stopping work. Meanwhile, the wife is devoting her time to her career. This happens quite naturally and without raising eyebrows anymore. So this may happen one day, but by and large I think we are still an Asian society. It will take much longer for us. But actually if you want to enter politics, there are so many more avenues now for you to do that. You can join a committee, make a contribution and make an impact even before you enter Parliament, and then you’ll be noticed. I don’t think there are barriers as such. If women are concerned about public life, what’s there to stop them?

Bharati: We discussed entrenched ideas in regard to gender roles. Did you get support from your husband in your political and academic career?

Wong: Yes, he was very helpful. He accompanied me a lot of times to my constituency functions, so that when I went home in the late evening, he could drive and I won’t be too tired. He also took charge of household management, especially in terms of grocery shopping, what we get to eat on the table and so on and so forth. In those days in the 80s, he was considered quite an unusual person.

Bharati: Some might say: “So what if there are not too many women in politics. It’s not important.” How would you respond to this? Why is it important to get more women in?

Wong: Let me be reflective on this. In the 1980s, when the first few of us entered Parliament, there were still quite a few burning issues that affected women that had to be settled. Things like citizenship for children born to Singapore women overseas, medical benefits to civil servants, the quota on female students in the medical school, and amendments to the Women’s Charter. So once those things were addressed over the next one, two decades, if you talked to women and asked them – what are the burning issues that affect women status in Singapore today – they may not be able to tell you very much.

Perhaps one or two things, the proportion of women in politics and secondly, the proportion of female representation on the boards of companies. This, you can still work on, and other countries have been doing it so Singapore should not be too far behind.

As for politics, I think it is a very different kind of a dedication of your life to public interest. But if you say that are there other burning issues…yes, women want their husbands to be more forthcoming in helping them to share the burden of making a home, being a father to the children and so on. But do you think the Government can do anything about that?

Bharati: The Government can encourage it by mandating even more paternity leave, and so on.

Wong: We have done that, and of course you can keep on expanding that, but somewhere you’ll hit the bottom-line of companies, and you’ll also have to pay attention to where the jobs are coming from.

Bharati: You mentioned the burning issues that affect women’s status today – there are not many and it could be that’s why women don’t feel the need to join politics in order to effect change. Ultimately though, women shouldn’t enter politics just to talk about women’s issues, or feel like that’s all they are good for and if there are no such issues, they don’t need to participate. Wouldn’t you say that any policy would benefit from a woman’s perspective?

Wong: You’ll have to think very hard. If you speak from your professional knowledge, your expertise from your knowledge of global issues, your knowledge of your particular competencies. So if you say women are different from men not only biologically, but maybe attitude-wise, women are much more for peace, much more for cooperation, more caring for social relations.

Bharati: That’s gender stereotyping too though. If we talk about the importance of female political representation, shouldn’t it be considered that certain Government policies may affect women differently from how they would affect men, and perhaps because of that, women need to be represented at that level?

Wong: Yes, there is some truth to that. But if you talk about competencies, I think there are universal standards.

Bharati: To have a say in policies across the spectrum – why don’t women feel the need to do this, to the extent of entering politics? I’ve heard you say before that you feel women in Singapore take women’s rights for granted. Could this be the reason?

Wong: I do think that our younger women who enjoy so many opportunities, so much support for what they want to do in education, in their careers, in their lives, have forgotten that all these rights and opportunities were hard-won by the women who were before them. Even in terms of the parliamentary process, it was more than 20 years before those anomalies in gender inequality were finally abolished.

There are still some issues to be addressed, and I hope the young women will take them up as their responsibility. But I also think that having obtained all those rights that they now enjoy, the question is: Do they feel responsible for handing them over to the next generation of women? How are they going to preserve those rights and make the world even better for the next generation to come? My fervent hope is that they would take a look at what has been accomplished and what lies ahead, and also bring up the next generation to be as brilliant, as accomplishing as they themselves are.

POLITICS AND CONSCIENCE

Bharati: Let’s move on to other aspects of your political career. Tell me about a time when the sort of decisions you had to make as Minister of State, or an MP, collided with your conscience?

Wong: Politics is actually a practical science. You really have to be practical. You may have your ideas, your ideals, and this may clash sometimes with what is going on, but then you have to realise that perhaps the time hasn’t come for your ideas. I’ll be very frank. I can think of one area that I felt quite uncomfortable with, when I was in the Ministry of Health, as a Minister of State. I think in those days, the Government, as a matter of economic growth policy, wanted to develop Singapore into the medical hub of the region. Because of our medical expertise and excellent facilities, we could service foreign patients from around this area – Indonesians, Thais, South Asians and even farther afield. And I felt uncomfortable, because I thought it might be putting the wrong emphasis on the issue of excellence in our medical services. I thought the focus really should be our citizens first, and foreigners later.

You could see a period during which restructured hospitals devoted quite a bit of resources to expanding this kind of service for foreign patients. But now they have much toned down, turned back, and I think the Government has emphasised and rightly so, that medical excellence is really to be for our own people first. For everything else, it should be in the private sector coming in and that would be a bonus to the Singapore economy. Was it against my conscience? Well, it was somewhat against my principles at the time that I agreed to certain policies and to implement them. But I also knew there was a time for everything.

Bharati: How did you justify it to yourself at that point though?

Wong: You get frustrated, but you just realise that well, if this is the choice that is to be made, then we will see what happens. Hopefully, one day it will change.

WHAT EDUCATION SHOULD BE

Bharati: You held the Education portfolio for a period and now you are the Chancellor of UniSIM, so we should talk about education-related issues. A lot has been said about education in Singapore – PSLE, stress, our university graduates not being prepared enough for the new economy. What do you think needs urgent attention at this time?

Wong: Education is so much a concern of everybody. I don’t think it is really entirely within the Ministry of Education to change things. I think definitely the world is now so uncertain. Competition is so fierce and keen. We should not look at university education or an undergraduate degree as the be-all and end-all of the education process.

On the one hand I think, definitely we need to encourage life-long learning. And this thing goes beyond schools, beyond the university. Then secondly, I think we need society to look at education in a different manner. Previously we all hung our hopes on children’s educational attainment as a sure ticket to a life of stable jobs, a good standard of living. Then (you) don’t have to worry ever after.

But I think we all realise now this is not going to be the case anymore. Nobody can look forward to just one job. There could be several changes of careers in your lifetime. You cannot just depend on one set of skills that you acquired in school or acquired at the university. You’ve got to upgrade. You’ve got to change your skill set and learn new things all the time. Thirdly, it calls for a change in our definition of success in life. What is it? Is it happiness? Is it a sense of purpose? And last of all, should all these be equated with having an education with certification? It’s not that we should not value skills or qualifications, but we should look at different ways.

There are so many things that you can do in life. You do not need to just narrowly focus on certain professions. Go follow your passions. Go follow your talent. Go follow your opportunities. That’s the important thing to do. And if the definition of success is happiness in what you do, pursue your passions. It is possible. But how do you define happiness? Or do you really want a purpose in life? Then you can do what you enjoy and at the same time, help others and contribute to society. I think that you have to think.

Bharati: Would you say the important thing is that people are given choices and feel free to make them?

Wong: Not just individual choice. I think individuals can go a bit off tangent also. I think we value what a person can do as a member of society. It’s not just about what you want to do for yourself. Yes, you can have the choice. Yes, you can pursue this kind of life if you want, and you should not be discriminated against. But in the end you should ask yourself: Am I being useful to others?

POLITICS AND RACE

Bharati: We talked about your involvement in women’s rights earlier. You have been known to be against quotas for women in politics. What about when it comes to race though? Recently, in light of a survey that showed most people in Singapore would be more accepting of a President of the same race as they are, has given rise to a debate about whether there needs to be a mechanism in place to ensure that a minority race President is elected from time to time.

Wong: Yes, all these studies still show some distance between people in terms of what kind of friends you make, whether you mind people who are of different races as colleagues, marrying people of a different race. So the racial distance studies have consistently showed it still exists, and I think it’s very difficult to completely eradicate. There are cultural differences that you have to accommodate when you enter into intimate relationships like marriage.

Bharati: That may be understandable, but when it comes to choosing political leaders, if the study is to be believed, isn’t it concerning that race would overpower merit?

Wong: In a society where it’s a meritocracy, the question of how people accept a person of a different race to be at the head of the government is really not just about race. It is a matter of politics and politics in a democracy is about numbers and majority. We have to consider how that plays into choices. And there’s a natural tendency for people of the same kind, same characteristics to group together. So the basics of representation have to be taken care of, but when it comes to race and the higher political offices, as Prime Minister Lee himself said before: “The time will come. When the time comes it comes.” So if you ask me if there will be a woman Prime Minister in Singapore, I would say when the time comes it will come. There’s a lot more mixed marriages now if you notice.

Bharati: Than before, certainly. Things might have improved, but we pride ourselves on being a multi-religious, multi-racial society, on being well-integrated and living in harmony. But is this just a superficial harmony that we’re talking about here? Shouldn’t more be done to deepen race relations so that race doesn’t overpower merit?

Wong: I wouldn’t belittle superficial harmony. In human interaction, how close are you to your neighbour? You may not be close, but you obviously want a harmonious relationship. You don’t want anymore than that perhaps. We are being civil. We want to be able to accommodate each other, so that we can live with each other.

Bharati: Is that good enough? Lots have been said by political leaders about this possibly fragile climate of tolerance being easily ruined.

Wong: Maybe good enough to some, but not good enough for others. Some people want to be more actively involved and try to make things better. They can work towards community bonding and so on so forth. Nothing to stop them.

Bharati: Your view seems to be that steps to improve should come from the community, or what will happen, will happen with time. But should the Government be doing more, or doing things differently in order to create a truly harmonious and accepting society. Not just one in which we tolerate each other? In Singapore, we have been known to create structures, and to create systems to ensure integration. For instance, the racial quotas in HDB estates.

Wong: In terms of racial integration, I was fully behind the quota system in HDB housing. I think that you must mix the various races. Otherwise they don’t get to mix. Even when they live next door to each other, the interaction is still, as you say, superficial, but harmonious. But then there’s nothing the Government can do to force it to be closer. But the policy was necessary. Otherwise, we may not even have what we have today.

Bharati: Some might say that if the racial quota system had worked, you wouldn’t need it anymore. People would be naturally and organically already interacting with each other and perhaps there wouldn’t even be the possibility of a rejection of minority races in positions of power.

Wong: I hear now that new immigrants are already coalescing into noticeable clusters. So should the Government enforce this more rigorously? Or should it relax it? I think it’s really a very different call. So does this work better towards racial harmony? I think not. But then the flip side of it is almost like segregation.

With regard to whether there would be a Prime Minister or President of a certain race in the future, or whether there should be more women MPs by setting up a quota system – that’s where I believe what will happen, will happen. Through interaction. Through evolution. I believe those things, we shouldn’t force.

Bharati: But some might say that the quotas or mechanisms would be designed merely to compensate for people’s racial or gender biases.

Wong: It will raise too many questions for the individual as well. I think there is also a question of whether you really want to do it. For example, when it comes to women, let me put it this way: Each person actually should enter Parliament in her own right, have her own contribution, and you do not need a special place, a special vacancy reserved for you to be able to play that role. You enter, you fight an election, and you do your job. But certain things we must do to prevent other things from happening, and that’s one of those things (the racial quotas in HDB estates) – encouraging and working to mould a community that binds together.

Bharati: What sort of legacy would you like to leave behind?

Wong: I have never really worked in order to leave a legacy. I have had a number of changes in my academic career even after stepping down from politics. I just hope that I will be looked at together with my former women parliamentary colleagues, as a trailblazer in terms of women who came forward to serve in the interest of the nation. I would be very happy and contented if people look at us as role models for the young women who aspire to contribute their talents, their abilities to a larger cause than themselves.



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA

1472259855_maxresdefault.jpg

How Tiny Are You Compared To the Biggest Sea Creatures?



Humans are so much smaller than a bunch of sea creatures. We thought it would be fun to animate our size compared to some of the largest animals.

To check out all our animated videos, make sure to ‘LIKE’ us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DiscoveryNews/videos
____________________

DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won’t find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.

Watch More DNews on TestTube http://testtube.com/dnews

Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel

DNews on Twitter http://twitter.com/dnews

Trace Dominguez on Twitter https://twitter.com/tracedominguez

Julia Wilde on Twitter https://twitter.com/julia_sci

DNews on Facebook https://facebook.com/DiscoveryNews

DNews on Google+ http://gplus.to/dnews

Discovery News http://discoverynews.com

Download the TestTube App: http://testu.be/1ndmmMq

source

Commentary: Why China dominates table tennis


SINGAPORE: In the unpredictable world of Olympic sports, there are few things which can be said with near certainty. China winning table tennis gold medals is one of them.

Since the sport was introduced into the Summer Games in 1988, China’s players have won 28 out of the 32 gold medals.

In the last three Olympics – Beijing, London and Rio – they swept all the gold medals on offer.

China has such an abundance of top players that its exports playing for other countries, including Singapore, regularly pick up silver and bronze medals.

Such dominance is not normal. No other country has held such a stranglehold over a sport, or even comes close to it.

South Korea’s strength in archery is one of the closest. It has won 23 out of 40 gold medals since modern archery was introduced in the Olympics in 1972.

But their win percentage of 57.5 is far from the bull’s eye mark of the Chinese paddlers, who have managed 87.5 per cent of gold medals.

And in case you’re wondering, such dominance is not normal even for China. The country has done superbly in diving and badminton, but they remain a distance from the supremacy of their table tennis compatriots.

China has won 71 per cent of the gold medals in diving since participating in the 1984 Games, and a rather humble 53 per cent of the badminton titles.

Clearly, China’s state-run sports system of a large talent pool, early scouting, and ruthless internal culling are not the only explanations for the unique success of its table tennis players.

There is something special about the sport in the world’s most populous country. 

Chinese schoolboys show off their table tennis skills during a practice session at a sports school in Beijing in 1996. (Photo: AFP)

SPREADING COMMUNISM 

A critical person behind the sport’s unique status in China is a filmmaker from London named Ivor Montagu.

The scion of a Jewish banking dynasty in England developed a strong interest in table tennis, codified the rules of the sport, and set up the International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF) in the 1920s.

He was also a fervent communist who believed that table tennis could help spread the ideology throughout the world.

The simple game was perfectly suited for the proletariat during a workday and the “balls were so light they flew best in windowless rooms”, meaning workers could play table tennis in factories, wrote Nicholas Griffin in The Secret History Behind the Game That Changed the World.

When the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took over China in 1949, Montagu was convinced that table tennis could help the new People’s Republic connect to the rest of the world.

So while the rest of the sporting world, including the International Olympic Committee (IOC), continued to recognise the Republic of China, the ITTF had the foresight to invite Beijing to join in 1951. 

Chinese athletes carrying a huge portrait of Chairman Mao Zedong on Oct 1, 1955 at Tiananmen Square in Beijing celebrating National Day. (Photo: AFP)

MAO’S SPIRITUAL NUCLEAR WEAPON

For the young People’s Republic, which was ostracised by much of the rest of the world, Montagu’s welcome was a godsend.

The CCP’s leaders like Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai were already playing the sport and Mao quickly declared table tennis the “national sport”, or guo qiu, of the country. That status remains till today.

In 1959, the country made a major breakthrough. Rong Guotuan won the men’s singles title in the World Table Tennis Championships in Germany.

He was the first Chinese world champion of any sport since the founding of the People’s Republic. Japan, the powerhouse of the sport at the time and arch enemy of China after World War II, swept all the other titles, making Rong’s win extra sweet.  

National pride soared and the propaganda value of the victory took on extra significance since it occurred during the 10th anniversary of the People’s Republic’s founding.
Table tennis became the symbol of China’s rise after a century of humiliation by the Western powers and Japan.

Mao congratulated Rong personally and hailed table tennis as China’s “spiritual nuclear weapon”. China would successfully test its first actual nuclear weapon only five years later in 1964. 

WHEN DOMINATION BEGINS

The sport truly took off in China. The low-maintenance game was a perfect fit for the impoverished nation.

All that was needed was a concrete slab acting as a table and a row of bricks standing in as a net.

Cramped Chinese urban neighbourhoods had no problems finding space for it, as compared to a tennis court, for instance.

In the countryside, peasants could easily rustle up a table, two paddles and a ball for hours of low-cost enjoyment.

Most Chinese who grew up in that era knew only one sport: table tennis. For example, former top leaders like Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao showcased their ping pong abilities during visits to Japan.

China grew stronger in the sport and began winning more world titles in the early 1960s at the expense of Japan.

The growth was interrupted by the Cultural Revolution in 1966, when top players were persecuted by the Red Guards. Rong committed suicide in 1968 after a period spent in detention. 

An American delegation of tennis table players pose with Chinese communist leaders in April 1971. (Photo: AFP)

PING PONG DIPLOMACY 

But China bounced back in the 1970s and an epochal event further cemented table tennis’ special place in the hearts of the Chinese people.

In the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Japan, a 19-year-old hippie American player named Glenn Cowan boarded a bus carrying the Chinese team.

The Chinese version of this story says that Cowan went up the bus mistakenly. Cowan said he was invited aboard by the Chinese.

An American tennis table player trains with a Chinese tennis table player in Beijing in April 1971. (Photo: AFP)

George Brathwaite returns a shot to China’s Liang Geliang on Jul 24, 1997 at the UN in New York during an exhibition match celebrating the 25th anniversary of “Ping Pong Diplomacy”, which marked the start of a US-China dialogue initiated by the Nixon administration in 1971 and 1972. (Photo: AFP)

Regardless, the top Chinese player Zhuang Zedong, who had already won three world singles titles, approached Cowan on the bus with a gift.

The exchange gave Beijing the opening it was looking for to seek détente with the United States, its erstwhile Cold War adversary.

Mao seized on it and invited the American ping pong team to visit China. The US paddlers became the first Americans to officially visit the People’s Republic.

This famous ping pong diplomacy paved the way for US President Richard Nixon’s historic trip to China the next year.

Chairman Mao Zedong (L) welcomes US President Richard Nixon on Feb 22, 1972. President Nixon urged China to join the United States in a “long march together” on different roads to world peace. (Photo: AFP)

By 1979, the US transferred diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. The IOC followed suit the same year, opening the way for China to participate at the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics for the first time.

In more ways than one, table tennis was the vehicle which helped China to reach out to the world during and after decades of isolation.

This has earned the sport an exalted status in the country, drawing resources and attention in a manner which surpasses other games.

When Beijing hosted the Olympics in 2008, then President Hu attended the women’s table tennis team final between China and Singapore and knew all the details of the players on both sides.

Barring a major change in politics in China, such devotion and sentimentality to the sport from the highest echelon to the grassroots, is likely to continue.

Expect China to reign supreme in table tennis for many more years.

* The writer is author of When the Party Ends, winner of the Singapore Literature Prize 2016, and former China bureau chief of The Straits Times. He is also the founding partner of The Nutgraf, a writing and communications agency. 



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA

51M4aZQilkL.jpg

The Cigar World



buy now

$95.00



Luxury, exclusivity, status―for centuries, the cigar has been a symbol for the special and extraordinary. Cigar smoking, which began over 2,000 years ago with the Maya, is experiencing a huge renaissance today. The cigar is a recreational luxury item in high demand, a combination of craftsmanship and tradition with a cult following that is hard to top. Connoisseur and cigar expert Cosima Aichholzer is one of the world’s leading authorities on cigars. There isn’t a cigar lounge in the world she hasn’t travelled to, or a brand that she hasn’t personally tested. In this standard reference work for all cigar experts and fans, the sophisticated Austrian provides authoritative answers to questions about the cigar’s history, production process, where tobacco for cigars is grown, how to buy and store cigars, and much more. Let us take you on an exciting and fascinating journey into the world of cigars. Learn more about the countries they come from, the raw materials that go into them, the craftsmanship involved in making them, and the world’s most beautiful cigar lounges, all shown in captivating pictures. Take a look at exclusive accessories, custom-made humidors, luxurious lighters, and many other items. So sit back, light up a cigar with celebrity fellow smokers, and peruse entertaining interviews that include tidbits like the cigar that Arnold Schwarzenegger finds unforgettable.

S R Nathan a 'great advocate' of closer Singapore-Malaysia ties: PM Najib


KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak paid tribute to the late former Singapore President S R Nathan when he signed the condolence book at the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur on Friday (Aug 26). 

Mr Nathan passed away peacefully at the Singapore Gerneral Hospital on Aug 22, three weeks after suffering a stroke. He was 92.  

Mr Najib thanked him for his many contributions, describing him as “a great advocate of closer ties” between Malaysia and Singapore. Mr Nathan served as Singapore’s High Commissioner to Malaysia from 1988 to 1990.

“On behalf of the government and people of Malaysia, I express my heartfelt condolences,” Mr Najib wrote. “The late President when he was a high commissioner and subsequently, President of Singapore, was a great advocate of closer ties between Malaysia and Singapore and for this we are very much appreciative of his contributions.”

The Malaysian delegation attending the funeral in Singapore Friday afternoon will be led by Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai. The delegation includes Youth Minister Khairy Jamaluddin and Minister in the Prime Minister’s department Joseph Kurup.

Mr Najib Razak’s condolence note at the Singapore High Commission in Kuala Lumpur.



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA

Roads around UCC to be closed for S R Nathan's State Funeral Service


SINGAPORE: Several roads and lanes near the National University of Singapore’s University Cultural Centre (UCC) will be closed from 10am to 6pm on Friday (Aug 26) to facilitate the State Funeral Procession for late former President S R Nathan.

The State Funeral Procession will leave Parliament House at 2pm and the State Funeral Service will be held from 3pm on Friday at UCC.

The closure of roads near Parliament House was detailed earlier by the police and Land Transport Authority (LTA). In another joint media release, they gave details of the additional road closures:

(Table: Police, LTA)

The media release added that the Funeral Service is a restricted event for invited guests only, and that police will conduct road blocks and security checks at and in the vicinity of UCC during the period. 

HEAVY TRAFFIC EXPECTED DURING STATE FUNERAL PROCESSION

The release also stated that traffic arrangements have been made to facilitate the Procession from Parliament House to UCC. From 1.45pm to 2.25pm, heavy traffic is expected along the following roads: 

  • Hill Street
  • North Bridge Road
  • Stamford Road
  • Esplanade Drive
  • Fullerton Road
  • Collyer Quay
  • Raffles Quay
  • Cross Street
  • Upper Cross Street
  • Havelock Road
  • Ganges Avenue
  • Alexandra Road
  • Commonwealth Avenue West
  • Commonwealth Avenue
  • Clementi Road

Authorities also advised against flying any unmanned aircraft, including drones, into or within the vicinity of UCC, as well as along the route of the State Funeral Procession. 

(Infographic: MCI)

PUBLIC BUS SERVICES TO BE DIVERTED 

LTA added that eight public bus services plying the area around Parliament House – 100, 107, 130, 131, 195, 75, 167 and 961 – will continue to be diverted until 5pm on Friday due to the road closures. 

“The Land Transport Authority (LTA) would like to advise and seek commuters’ understanding to expect delays in bus journeys along the affected routes where special traffic arrangements have been made to facilitate the State Funeral Procession from the Parliament House to the University Cultural Centre,” the release stated. 

Additionally, service 96 and service 151, which serve bus stops near UCC, will be temporarily diverted from 10am to 6pm on Friday due to the closure of Kent Ridge Crescent for the State Funeral Service, the release said. 

Police officers will be stationed at all affected road junctions. “As traffic may be heavy within the vicinity, motorists should expect some delays and are advised to plan their travel routes early,” the release said. “During the road closures, access will only be granted to police and emergency vehicles. Parking restrictions will be strictly enforced. Vehicles parked illegally or causing obstruction will be towed.” 

Members of the public who have questions about the State Funeral Procession or the State Funeral Service can call 6336 1166.



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA

61LKtY7dlNL.jpg

Luxury Lifestyle 10′ x 10′ CP Backdrop Computer Printed Scenic Background GladsBuy Backdrop ZJZ-488



buy now

$49.99



This item is a scenic brand new computer-printed 10′ W x 10′ H backdrop. It is light enough not to be a hassle (especially if you are working on location), yet durable enough to last and get the job done right! It can be draped or hung straight easily! It is great for all types of photography: family, children, high school seniors, wedding, models, or even commercial work. This 10′ W x 10′ H backdrop is spliced by two pieces of cloth, it has been spliced into a complete backdrop, although it is not seamless, but it does not interfere the picture. And there is no pocket on its top. We can provide backdrop custom, such as the image or size, if you are not satisfied with the size of the backdrop, the picture, or you need to modify some of the pictures, you can contact us, we will provide the best custom service.The material is synthetic fiber cloth
Printed on chemical fiber material for light weight and easy handling.
Excellent color treatment and realistic detail.
Ideal for Studio, Club, Party, event or home photography.

Myanmar weighs damage after earthquake rattles Bagan pagodas


BAGAN: Officials picked through the wreckage of toppled spires and crumbling temple walls in Myanmar’s ancient capital Bagan on Thursday (Aug 25) after a powerful earthquake rattled the top tourist destination, leaving three dead.

Two young girls and a man died in Magway region where the 6.8-magnitude quake struck Wednesday evening, cracking buildings across centre of the country and sending tremors that were felt as far away as Bangkok and Kolkata.

In nearby Bagan, home to a vast plain of some 2,500 Buddhist monuments that are among Myanmar’s most venerated religious sites, teams of government-dispatched engineers and architects surveyed damage to nearly 200 of the prized pagodas.

“First we need to figure out the extent of the damage,” Arkar Kyaw, the deputy director of Myanmar’s culture ministry said. “Then we will make a renovation plan,” he told AFP, adding that the government is working directly with UNESCO.

First estimates showed at least 185 pagodas at Bagan were damaged, as security officers blocked tourists from entering temples while workers cleared piles of bricks, swept the grounds and sorted through fragments of murals.

“I heard sounds after I paid homage at a pagoda. There were foreign tourists there as well,” said Khin Maung Toe, a Myanmar man who was visiting Bagan for the first time when the earthquake struck. “My wife barely escaped outside as the pagoda collapsed,” he told AFP.

The temples, many of which are around 1,000 years old, are a top attraction for tourists flocking to Myanmar as it emerges from decades of military rule.

The UNESCO office in Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city, has deployed experts to assess the damage, said office head Sardar Umar Alam.

The government is also sending teams from its culture and geology departments, he added.

“It takes time to know how the structures are stabilised and how bad the actual damage is — if a roof collapses, how much it affects different walls and mural paintings,” Alam said.

UNESCO said that it is asking more foreign experts to fly in to help with repair and conservation of quake-affected pagodas. 

Bagan’s vast expansive of temple ruins — which make for a staggering sunset vista — have survived wars, earthquakes and centuries of tropical sun. 

In its heyday the city, which was the capital of a powerful kingdom from the 9th to 13th centuries, was one of Asia’s most important centres for learning.

Amanda George from the International Red Cross in Myanmar said that while the organization continued to provide help and assistance in search and rescue operations, it was not treating it as a major emergency situation.

“The government-run National Emergency Operation Centre stood down at about 8 p.m. last night. We normally follow their lead and coordinate closely,” said George.

“We continue to provide assistance to injured people, but we don’t see this as a major disaster.”

HAPHAZARD RENOVATION?

The last major quake to damage the site struck in 1975 and was followed by a controversial restoration effort under the military junta that stepped down in 2011.

Experts said the haphazard renovation work, much of it hastily done with modern materials, significantly altered the original architecture and design of some monuments.

In recent years, as the country undergoes a democratic transition and opens up following decades of isolationist junta rule, UNESCO has worked directly with the government to safeguard the monuments.

Bagan rivals Cambodia’s Angkor Wat and Borobudur in Indonesia as Southeast Asia’s premier archaeological site.

“I am very sad because our ancient pagodas are damaged and some have collapsed now. I hope nothing like that happens again,” said Aung Naing Win, 32, a craft maker from Bagan.

“But perhaps the authorities should leave some damaged ones unrepaired so that future generations can see such disasters happen.”

Myanmar is eager to see the city listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. Travel to the once-cloistered country used to be reserved for the well-heeled and intrepid, prepared to endure the travails of a country under military rule with patchy electricity and limited communications.

But foreign tourists have poured in since the military stepped down in 2011, with many of them making a beeline for Bagan. This year Myanmar is on track to welcome 5.5 million tourists, nearly a million more than 2015, according to Tint Thwin, director-general of Ministry of Hotels and Tourism.

Myanmar is in a seismically active part of the world where the Indo-Australian Plate runs up against the Eurasian Plate. A magnitude 6.9 tremor hit northwestern Myanmar in April but caused no major loss of life.



Source link
NEWSFEEDCNA